|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- This Web presentation created from PowerPoint slideshow developed by
Adam Levine for the PWD/Office of Watersheds.
- Images and newspaper articles are Copyright 2005 and should not be
reproduced in any form without permission from the holding institutions.
For more information contact Adam Levine.
|
|
3
|
- SOURCE: Frankford Historical Society
- Even in 1898, the creek and its tributaries were being polluted by
untreated sewage, and by wastes from dozens of factories in the
watershed.
|
|
4
|
- SOURCE: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
- In 1956 a diversion channel was built to carry the creek directly to the
Delaware River, cutting off a stretch of the stream that wound
through Bridesburg. The original
mouth of the creek still exists, visible on this map as the little
dogleg to the north of the modern creek outlet. The old creek bed,
roughly marked in red, was filled in, and now is the location of the
Delaware Expressway (I-95) and various sewers. The sewer outfall
upstream shows where the former Wingohocking Creek, now carried
underground in one the largest sewers in the city, once joined the
Tacony Creek to form the Frankford.
|
|
5
|
- SOURCE: Free Library Map Collection, Baist Atlas, 1889
Moving upstream from the mouth at the Delaware River in
Bridesburg, the tributaries to the Frankford include Little Tacony
Creek, Wingohocking Creek and Tacony Creek, which has Rock Run as one of
its tributaries. The watershed covers 35 square miles in Philadelphia
and Montgomery counties. Except for the Tacony and the Frankford, all
the streams in the Philadelphia section of the watershed have been
converted into sewers.
|
|
6
|
- SOURCE: Free Library Map Collection,
Dripps Map, 1849
Industrialists made major changes to the creek, damming it in
various places, digging channels, called mill races, to carry the water
from these mill ponds into and out of their factories. More than 30 factories of various
sizes, many of them making textiles, operated in the watershed in 1849.
In spite of this industrial presence in certain sections, the watershed
as still mostly open land, with its tributary system still intact.
|
|
7
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
- In 1799 Frankford Creek was declared a “navigable stream” from the mouth
to Frankford Avenue, where the influence of the tide ends. This put the
creek under the jurisdiction of the U.S. government, specifically, the
engineers of the War Department (now known as the Army Corps of
engineers). As such, the bridges
over the creek in that stretch either had to be high enough to let craft
pass under, or be movable, as was this turn bridge at Orthodox Street.
|
|
8
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
- Unfortunately, the Federal authorities did little over the years to help
maintain a navigable channel in Frankford Creek. Even though they mostly
refused to maintain the creek after the 1880s, they maintained
jurisdiction for more than 50 years afterwards, which made it difficult
for the City or any governmental body to do any work on the creek
channel.
|
|
9
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
- The City did dredge the creek at various places, but by 1929 the lower
Frankford was basically not navigable by large commercial craft.
|
|
10
|
- SOURCE: Free Library Map Collection, 1889 Baist Atlas
- Wingohocking Creek drained most of Germantown and reached as far as
northwest as Mt. Airy. Rock Run drained the Olney, Fern Rock and Oak
Lane sections of the city.
|
|
11
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
- The Wingohocking was largest
creek system in the city to be put underground. With east and west
branches and other smaller tributaries, its watershed covered 9 square
miles with about 21 miles of stream. By the time this photograph was
taken, it had been partly piped underground, with the above-ground
stretches basically an open sewer, carrying the wastes of tens of
thousands of people and dozens of factories.
|
|
12
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/
- Urban Archives, Philadelphia Bulletin Collection
This article refers to one of the final sections of Wingohocking
to be converted into a sewer. The process of burying the creek began in
the 1880s and culminated in 1928, when the creek was finally obliterated
from all but the city’s sewer maps. The creek was covered in Germantown
first, and then the sewer was extended both upstream and downstream as
adjacent areas became ripe for development.
|
|
13
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/Urban Archives,
Philadelphia Bulletin Collection
- Before creeks were converted into sewers, branch sewers simply emptied
into them, and factories dumped their wastes into them. Converting these
polluted streams into sewers was seen by city engineers and health
officials as a way to bury a potential health hazard, as the highlighted
sections of this article note.
|
|
14
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
- Besides the perceived benefits to public health, putting creeks into
underground pipes was the cheapest and easiest way to provide an
undeveloped area with a main sewer (a large sewer into which many
smaller sewers empty). Sewage is more than 99 percent water, and the
easiest way to move water or any liquid is by gravity. Since the creeks
were already flowing downhill by gravity, putting sewers in stream beds
provided the gravity flow needed. Instead of excavating to bury the
pipes in a trench, which was expensive, the completed sewers were then
buried under fill.
|
|
15
|
- SOURCE:
- Free Library Map Collection
Another reason for
- burying streams has to
- do with the city’s grid
- system. Streams don’t
- follow straight lines,
- they meander here and
- there, cutting across
- the rigid geometry that has been
imposed on the Philadelphia landscape since William
- Penn’s time. After burying the creeks, their
valleys would be filled in -- the
- Wingohocking valley, in some
places, was leveled with up to 40 feet of fill-- and then
- the street grid could be run over the valley without having to build
expensive bridges at
- every creek crossing. Note the
two bridges needed to cross this bend in Frankford Creek
- at Wyoming Avenue. A slight
deviation from the City’s rectangular grid could have
- placed a curving street around
the bend, and eliminated the cost of the bridges.
|
|
16
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
- Sections of the Wingohocking sewer includes pipes more than 20 feet
across, among the largest in the Philadelphia’s 3000 mile sewer system.
|
|
17
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
- The elevated metal pipe is
temporarily carrying water over the work site. Once the sewer is
finished, it will be buried along with new water and gas lines, with a
new street built ands paved on top of it, providing a ready-made
infrastructure for the dense residential development that quickly spread
over this once-rural area.
|
|
18
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
|
|
19
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
|
|
20
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
|
|
21
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
This ditch, or flume, will
carry the creek flow as the sewer is built in the creek bed.
|
|
22
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
Workmen pausing for the city’s Public Works photographer.
|
|
23
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
|
|
24
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
- Once the sewer is finished, the pipe will be buried, Ashdale Street will
be laid out on top of it, and new rows of houses will join those seen in
this photo on the valley’s edge.
|
|
25
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
A view inside a completed section of sewer.
|
|
26
|
- By the 1890s Little Tacony Creek was badly polluted, both by industrial
wastes from textile factories such as Briggs & Co., and raw sewage.
Frankford Creek is on the left.
|
|
27
|
- SOURCE: 1910 Smith Atlas,
Free Library Map Collection
- Streamside factories (such as the Globe Dye Works) would often use the
water for their various processes, and then dump the used water back
into the creek. The wastes from a dye works could turn a creek many
colors, depending on the dyes being used. Beginning in the early 1900s and
continuing into the 1930s, a
sewer was built to carry this polluted tributary. Note on the map
how the city engineers, planning for the eventual burial of this stream,
laid out Torresdale Avenue along its course.
|
|
28
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
The city’s first large-scale sewage treatment plant was opened in
1923, on Wheatsheaf Lane near the mouth of Frankford Creek. The first
sewage to be treated by the Northeast Sewage Treatment Works was the
flow of the Wingohocking Creek/Sewer, which still ran in the open creek
bed in various places. The stream was diverted into an intercepting
sewer and carried to the plant, relieving Frankford Creek of the sewage
of more than 100,000 people.
|
|
29
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
The complete interceptor system for this area took many years to
complete, due to delays caused by the Depression and World War II.
|
|
30
|
- SOURCE: Free Library Map Collection
- Even the city began to deal with raw sewage in streams, industrial
pollution continued to be a problem. Many factories continued to run
waste pipes directly into Frankford Creek and other Philadelphia
streams. In this plan, the mill race runs under the bleach house, no
doubt carrying wastewater directly to the creek.
|
|
31
|
- SOURCE: Free Library Map Collection
|
|
32
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
- A 1937 law forbidding the dumping of factory wastes was rarely enforced,
partly due to the political and economic power of factory owners.
|
|
33
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/Urban Archives
Philadelphia Bulletin Collection
See the next slide for the text of the letters that accompanied
these pictures which, being black and white, don’t show the creek’s true
colors.
|
|
34
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/Urban Archives
Philadelphia Bulletin Collection
|
|
35
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/Urban Archives
Philadelphia Bulletin Collection
|
|
36
|
Besides the dams and mill races built
- by factory owners, and the occasional
- encroachments of their buildings
- into the flood plain, official
- channel changes, paid for by government funds, were also undertaken.
- Emergency dredging projects, by the city or the U.S. government,
attempted to
- keep the lower stretches of the creek open for navigation. Other
- channel changes were designed to remove constrictions in creek , such as
- sharp bends, which were often the locations of overflows during storms.
The
- first channel change of which there is a good visual record was
undertaken by
- the city in 1901-1902. As shown in the following atlas plates, a sharp
bend was
- smoothed out, which allowed the construction of two higher bridges and
- reconfiguring of streets in vicinity of Frankford.
|
|
37
|
- SOURCE: 1894 Bromley Atlas and 1910 Smith Atlas, Free Library Map
Collection
|
|
38
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
In this photograph, taken before the channel of the creek was
changed, it is difficult to even find a channel at all.
|
|
39
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
- The so-called ‘Six Arch Bridge” at Frankford Avenue, built in
1796,tended to constrict the flow of the creek during high water and was
replaced as a part of this project.
|
|
40
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
The new creek channel under construction.
|
|
41
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
- The same view as the previous slide, after the channel revision.
|
|
42
|
- SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Department Archives
- Flooding became an increasing problem after the 1920s, as the farmland
upstream from Frankford proper was built up with dense rowhouse
neighborhoods. The removal of several upstream dams also released large
amounts of silt into the creek channel, reducing its capacity.
|
|
43
|
- SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Department Archives
A 1931 study of the creek found that it had a capacity of only
2,200 cubic feet per second, while typical flood flows could range from
5,000 to 10,000 c.f.s.
|
|
44
|
- SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Department Archives
While the dry-weather flow, as seen in this picture, was barely
ankle-deep on an eight-year-old boy, the creek during rainstorms could
quickly turn into a raging torrent, spilling out into the adjacent
factories and neighborhoods, damaging business and homes.
|
|
45
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/Urban Archives
Philadelphia Bulletin Collection
- Illustration from March 18, 1956, Philadelphia Inquirer Sunday Magazine
|
|
46
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/Urban Archives, Philadelphia
Bulletin Collection
Owners of businesses along the creek appealed to the City for
relief from the frequent floods, but the City deferred to the Federal
government, which still maintained jurisdiction over the creek as a
navigable stream.
|
|
47
|
- SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Department Archives
- The fact that the factories were often built in the flood plain, or
encroached in the creek channel, did not lessen the righteousness of the
business owners’ appeals. The jobs they created were an important
bargaining point.
|
|
48
|
- SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Department Archives
Factories tried to protect their buildings bricking up the lower
windows and doors, to keep floodwaters at bay.
|
|
49
|
- SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Department Archives
Low-slung bridges, like this pipe bridge between two factory
buildings, also tended to catch debris and constrict the flow of water.
|
|
50
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
Local business owners appealed to the Mayor to do something about
the flooding problem. A city survey of the creek in 1931 had recommended
dredging, channel changes and bulkhead construction that would have cost
an estimated $2 million. Since the country was in the midst of the
Depression, no money was available for such work.
|
|
51
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
In this letter, John McCoy, secretary of the Edgewater Dyeing and
Finishing Company, refers to the creek as the “Frankford Sewage Canal.”
The irony that McCoy and other business people seemed to miss is that it
was often their factories that were creating the problems that they were
appealing to the City to alleviate.
|
|
52
|
- SOURCE: Free Library Print &
Picture Dept.
- Instead of a major overhaul of the creek, the City was able to do only
piecemeal projects. Undertaken in cooperation with the Works Progress
Administration, the removal of this bend employed more than 1000 men,
who worked at low tide using shovels and wheelbarrows to straighten the
channel.
|
|
53
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
|
|
54
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/Urban Archives,
- Philadelphia Bulletin Collection, and Free Library Map Collection
|
|
55
|
- SOURCE: Frankford Historical Society
The area in red shows the former location of the horseshoe bend.
|
|
56
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/Urban Archives
Philadelphia Bulletin Collection
- At this 1938 hearing, the Federal government refused to do anything
about the flooding and problems, but continued to maintain its
jurisdiction over the creek as a navigable stream. Without Federal
support, the city lacked the funds to undertake any such project itself.
|
|
57
|
- SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Department Archives
- In fact, the Federal authorities knew that the lower creek had not been
navigable since the late 1920s, due to silting problems that led to
exposed mud flats in most places except at high tide. The city’s 1931
survey of the creek found that it
navigable only by small craft “at advantageous stages of the
tide.”
|
|
58
|
- SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Department Archives
- Ironically, while lack of maintenance severely limited travel on the
creek, one of the U.S.
government’s reasons for not funding improvements was that there was
insufficient commerce on the creek to justify the expenditures.
|
|
59
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/ Urban Archives, Philadelphia
Bulletin Collection
Continued lobbying finally convinced the Federal officials, in
1940, to declare that the creek was not navigable, relinquishing is
jurisdiction and thus freeing the City to undertake much-needed work.
The onset of World War II delayed the start of this and most other
non-essential public work projects until after the war’s end, in 1947.
|
|
60
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/Urban Archives, Philadelphia
Bulletin Collection
An integral part of the flood control program was the
construction of a new cut-off channel to carry the creek directly to the
Delaware River.
|
|
61
|
- SOURCE: 1888 Baist Atlas
City Archives of Philadelphia
One of the first sections of the creek to be changed in the flood
control project was this large bend in what is now the Juniata Park golf
course.
|
|
62
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/Urban Archives
- A cut-off channel, combined with a stilling basin, was designed to keep
silt from flowing into a new concrete channel to be built in downstream
sections.
|
|
63
|
- SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
|
|
64
|
- SOURCE: City of Philadelphia Archives
|
|
65
|
|
|
66
|
- 1934 (above)
SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Dept. Archives
- 1950 (right)
SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
|
|
67
|
- 1934 (above)
SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Dept. Archives
- 1950 (right)
SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
|
|
68
|
- 1934 (above)
SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Dept. Archives
- 1950 (right)
SOURCE: City Archives of Philadelphia
|
|
69
|
- All photos from
City Archives of Philadelphia
|
|
70
|
- Ground-breaking (or more accurately, creek breaking)
Mayor Bernard Samuel is at the controls of the steam shovel
|
|
71
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
75
|
- SOURCE: Philadelphia Water Dept. Archives
- A section of the creek near Leiper Street (shown in red) was channeled
into an underground conduit as part of the flood control project. The
aerial view to the left is from 1960; above, 1946.
|
|
76
|
- SOURCE: Temple University Libraries/Urban Archives
Philadelphia Bulletin Collection
- The final part of the flood control project--the diversion of the lower
portion of the creek into a new channel--was completed in 1956. The old
creek channel was mostly filled in, with sewers built in part of its
bed.
|
|
77
|
- SOURCE: Free Library Map Collection
|
|
78
|
- SOURCE: City of Philadelphia Archives
|
|
79
|
- In summary, the watershed of the lower creek was transformed from this
natural, if compromised, system shown on the 1889 map (left), to what
is, in many sections, now little more than an urban stormwater conduit.
|